Ace 100 (92) rear shocks
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:25 pm
Sheesh! I go away for a few months to take care of some business and you guys have completely churched up the place... to include deleting my old user account! Anyways, the new forum and site look great. My kudos to all involved.
I did a frame-up on my '68 Ace 100 (92) a while ago and one of the (many) things I wasn't able to source was a set of new rear shocks. I used a wire brush to scrape most of the surface rust off of them, but they are obviously shot (no dampening whatsoever) and I'd like to replace them.
If I had my druthers, I'd get some stock replacements but that seems to be a fool's errand since OEM replacements don't seem to exist. Currently, one of Paul's competitor's (I can't remember if it was kosher to mention another site in this forum) has regular and progressive rear shocks on sale but neither are for the 92. The "regular" shocks are available for the 92B and the progressives are listed in a overall length that appears similar to the OEM ones on my 92. I don't think I really need progressives on this since I put "maybe" 200 miles on this bike a year and less than 20 of those are in the rough. If the progressives are really beneficial in the rough and the street, I'll do it, but I'd rather spend ~$100 then ~$300.
My question has to do with whether I can use either of these options on my bike. I don't have any problems machining some adapters but I really don't want to have to cut the frame on this one.
Insight, advice, commentary?
I did a frame-up on my '68 Ace 100 (92) a while ago and one of the (many) things I wasn't able to source was a set of new rear shocks. I used a wire brush to scrape most of the surface rust off of them, but they are obviously shot (no dampening whatsoever) and I'd like to replace them.
If I had my druthers, I'd get some stock replacements but that seems to be a fool's errand since OEM replacements don't seem to exist. Currently, one of Paul's competitor's (I can't remember if it was kosher to mention another site in this forum) has regular and progressive rear shocks on sale but neither are for the 92. The "regular" shocks are available for the 92B and the progressives are listed in a overall length that appears similar to the OEM ones on my 92. I don't think I really need progressives on this since I put "maybe" 200 miles on this bike a year and less than 20 of those are in the rough. If the progressives are really beneficial in the rough and the street, I'll do it, but I'd rather spend ~$100 then ~$300.
My question has to do with whether I can use either of these options on my bike. I don't have any problems machining some adapters but I really don't want to have to cut the frame on this one.
Insight, advice, commentary?