Page 1 of 1

1974 Super Combat vs 1974 Super Rat Porting

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 2:57 pm
by SteveWilcox
Hi Everyone,
Can anyone tell me why Hodaka did not use the Victory Port layout of the Super Combat in the Super Rat?
I was lucky enough to get my hands on a 1974 Super Combat and a 1974 Super Rat, (both basket cases) and I was surprised when I looked at the Super Rat cylinder.
Was this a money saving issue?
From this forum I have learned that the Super Rat and the Road Toad cylinders are very simlilar...just exhaust port height difference?
Would the Victory Port style porting have resulted in a more powerful Super Rat?
Thanks,
Steveo

Re: 1974 Super Combat vs 1974 Super Rat Porting

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 3:33 pm
by racerclam
I dont know why exactly thier reasoning is for that , but my own logic tells me the rod length would be why the rat uses traditional boost ports , the distance from the top of the intake port to transfer port height is less and no room for it. And no there would not be a power advantage in having the victory port design, more important is the angle of the port . Also the toad cylinder exaust port is 3mm lower that is the only difference,

Rich

Re: 1974 Super Combat vs 1974 Super Rat Porting

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 6:20 pm
by gearyoliver
So for only 3 millimetres I could have a SUPER TOAD?
SuperToad-547x547.jpg

Re: 1974 Super Combat vs 1974 Super Rat Porting

Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 12:41 pm
by racerclam
Only if it had the rat pipe , carb , head and ignition

Rich

Re: 1974 Super Combat vs 1974 Super Rat Porting

Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 3:00 pm
by gearyoliver
Buzzkill! :lol:

It would be fun though.