Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

The main Page for the Hodaka Club Discussion Group
Post Reply
EW57
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:21 am

Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by EW57 »

Greetings, all other factors aside (for now), what did the typical aftermarket earles/leading link front end weigh in comparison to the hodaka forks?

Thanks!
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by hodakamax »

Good question. Leading link forks look heavier than stock conventional forks and I always assumed they were. This all dependent on several factors but generally the leading link replacement is about the same weight or even lighter than the originals. It would be interesting to weigh some examples. Notice that the bike in the avatar picture on the right has leading link forks. Maxie
Bruce Young
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:48 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by Bruce Young »

Max as a reference point, the Van Tech flyer page and info list their units at approx 16lbs, most other leading link forks, DKW and etc I think where a lot heavier.
PS the leading link fork for off road use, worked fantastic over logs, rocks and rough terrain, but did not turn as quickly as a reg. set of forks. Great desert forks. Bruce Young
Bruce Young - HodakaPartsIdaho
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by hodakamax »

When the new Model 93 Super Rats arrived at the shop, we took the first crate of two for the Shop's Moto-cross effort. I rode one. The early fork tubes proved to be weak and were quickly replaced by warranty but we had already panicked and replaced both sets with VanTech leading link forks and 21" front wheels. As Bruce said they did not turn as quickly but the problem was solved with a lengthening of the swing arms. They proved to be quite effective especially on rough terrain and both of us preferred them over the stock units. My report.
Attachments
VT forks, 21'' front, lengthened Swingarm.
VT forks, 21'' front, lengthened Swingarm.
viclioce
Posts: 4835
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:35 pm
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Contact:

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by viclioce »

Is that you Maxie??? :ugeek: Victor

1978 175SL
1976 03 Wombat
1975 99 Road Toad (2)
1973 96 Dirt Squirt (2)
1973 “Wombat Combat”
1973 Combat Wombat
1972 94 Wombat (2)
1972 Super Squirt
1971 92B+ Ace
1970 92B Ace 100B (2)
1968 92 Ace 100
1966 Ace 90
; D Victor
taber hodaka
Posts: 2237
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:34 pm

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by taber hodaka »

That is not the old man, that is the kid. ----------------- Clarence
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by hodakamax »

Victor, yep, tis I, nearly fifty years ago. Somewhat fast then, somewhat slow now. All true Clarence my friend, what fun that time in life was. The best actually!
viclioce
Posts: 4835
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:35 pm
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Contact:

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by viclioce »

Maxie. I remember being 16 and getting my 1st bike! It was a heavy pig, a Kawasaki F6 125. Long stroke and no power. Looked just like this one. :ugeek: Victor
Attachments
2B848EAD-22ED-4ED5-983C-5473DB490F46.jpeg

1978 175SL
1976 03 Wombat
1975 99 Road Toad (2)
1973 96 Dirt Squirt (2)
1973 “Wombat Combat”
1973 Combat Wombat
1972 94 Wombat (2)
1972 Super Squirt
1971 92B+ Ace
1970 92B Ace 100B (2)
1968 92 Ace 100
1966 Ace 90
; D Victor
Droydx
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:44 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by Droydx »

I've got a set of LL forks, I believe are Steens, in my pile o' stuff. I have never weighed them, but they are HEAVY. The down tubes are steel and youi've got two full size shocks on them. I can dig them out of storage and put them on a scale if you would be interested.

Andy
EW57
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:21 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by EW57 »

Thanks for the replies everyone!

Andy, if it's not too much trouble, I'd like to take you up on your offer of weighing your steens frontend.

Take care all!
dirty_rat
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:39 am
Location: Spring Hill, FL

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by dirty_rat »

If anyone does weigh a set of leading link forks, don't forget to weigh them with the appropriate shocks installed to get an accurate gauge of the weight difference between them and the standard forks.
Droydx
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:44 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by Droydx »

After comparing the forks that I have to pictures of other LL forks, I am pretty sure that mine are Van Tech's, not a Steens unit. I weighed the fork, complete with the shocks, (old Girlings it looks like) brake plate, fender brace and front axle. It came in at 22.2 lbs....not exactly svelte, but it sure is a beefy unit!

Andy
Attachments
20190210_133113.jpg
EW57
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:21 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by EW57 »

Andy,

Thank you sir! I appreciate the info.
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by hodakamax »

Still interested in this weight comparison thing and if I ever get un-frozen, I think I have a set of 93 forks scattered around the Hodaka shed that I can weigh with equal components. Be patient. Maxie
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by hodakamax »

Well, the Hodaka shed has thawed out. Here's about the same stuff off of a model 93 Super Rat, missing a brake arm and my one pound fork brace might be a bit lighter than the above fender mount. All of this weighs in at 21.0 pounds compared to the leading link at 22.2 pounds. Just as I suspected, about the same. Interesting, always argued but never actually weighed anything. There ya go. Maxie
Attachments
DSCN5696.jpg
EW57
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:21 am

Re: Earles/leading link vs telescopic/OEM fork weight

Post by EW57 »

Thanks again, I appreciated it!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests