100 B forks

The main Page for the Hodaka Club Discussion Group
Post Reply
rtboone
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:07 am

100 B forks

Post by rtboone »

Greetings

Can anyone tell me if 100B forks would work on a 93A?
I know that the internals are different, but I am unsure if they are the same length and if they use the same axle.

Thanks

Tom
User avatar
RichardMott
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:36 am
Location: King of Prussia, Pa

Re: 100 B forks

Post by RichardMott »

Looking at the schematics the only difference I can see part number wise is the 100 B+ shows this difference is #6;

06.1- Item # / Fig. N - Hodaka Part #938753A - Fork inner tube (Beginning Frame B-53413)

Item #2 are the same number which lead same to believe they are the same dimensionally.

Anyone else know?
Rick Mott

In order to be old and wise, you must survive young and stupid!
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: 100 B forks

Post by hodakamax »

All that I remember is the first batch of 93s I received had weak fork tubes. They were all replaced under warranty. I have a 93A hand book beginning Frame No. B-53113 that also shows the fork tube as 938753A. The model 93 had 938707 fork tubes which were the weak ones (?) and were replaced by the 100 B+ 938753A tubes. (I think.)

Max

More--I see that a 92B+ had a #938750 fork assembly, a 93 had a #938700 and a 93A had a #938750 that changed to a #938750A on frame # B53413. It looks like they are all interchangeable. WHEW!
dirty_rat
Posts: 748
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:39 am
Location: Spring Hill, FL

Re: 100 B forks

Post by dirty_rat »

The earlier "weak" forks did not have an allen bolt in the bottom that held in the damper rod. The lowers were a one piece design with the damper rod built in. The top triple clamp also had a small ridge around the top, where the forks seated against it (no up or down adjustment to these forks). Because of these differences, the forks are not interchangeable, unless you also change the top triple clamp (and then the whole assemblies have to be used, the individual parts are not interchangeable.) The lower triple clamps were the same so they can be used with either fork (as long as we are talking about the 30mm forks).
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: 100 B forks

Post by hodakamax »

When we changed the 93s weak fork tubes to the 92B+ fork tubes under warranty they bolted up with no modifications. I see that the upper fork plate on a 93 and 100B #938701 is different than the 92B+ and 93A (after frame #B53413) with the #938701A upper fork plate. Confusing huh! :shock:

Maxie
Zyx
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:41 pm

Re: 100 B forks

Post by Zyx »

I agree with Max. My 100B forks were traded years back for 93 forks, which I never had problems with, and then I traded them out last year for forks that could be 100B or 93A, no telling. No need to change the top clamp, and if the ridge is a bother for you, file it out. Just about any 30mm forks will bolt in.
User avatar
RichardMott
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:36 am
Location: King of Prussia, Pa

Re: 100 B forks

Post by RichardMott »

On my wife's DS we used butter forks. The top triple tree clamp cracked at the pinch bolts, both sides, which was a blessing in disguise. The replacement top clamp is a non-ridged which allowed me to lower it.
Attachments
butter forks
butter forks
Rick Mott

In order to be old and wise, you must survive young and stupid!
Zyx
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:41 pm

Re: 100 B forks

Post by Zyx »

Better they should crack in the garage than coming down a mountain somewhere... :shock:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests